11 Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

1. I can only hope that some Mauritians don’t try to be “smart” and close the doors for other Mauritians who want to play by the rules.

   Comment by Patrick Ng — Sunday, 31 May 2009 11:39 GMT #

2. Well, there’d be at most 1.5 million illegal immigrants from Mauritius, assuming the whole population decide to become so. In this regard, I’d say that Mauritius presents a very low risk for the signatory countries.

   Eddy.

   Comment by Eddy — Sunday, 31 May 2009 22:07 GMT #

3. You can now cross the channel without needing a visa :-)

   Comment by Patrick Ng — Monday, 1 June 2009 00:18 GMT #

4. That’s leave the risk of being deported very high if the customs officer do not get your la tete. That was the fate of a hotel employee who was granted visa to stay in the UK temporarily but who was deported with no official reason. The unofficial one being he is a member of a particular community.

   Comment by clive — Monday, 1 June 2009 05:31 GMT #

5. Clive,

   Rumours and speculation.

   Immigration officers have to justify their decisions. It’s not just a matter of someone refusing you entry because (s)he does not like you. An interview can last hours before a visa is granted. During that time, the answers given by the traveller are verified. I know because my cousin came here and was held overnight while his answers were cross-checked.

   Eddy.

   Comment by Eddy Young — Monday, 1 June 2009 09:03 GMT #

6. @Eddy
   They don’t need a lot of illegal immigrants to become very suspicious. A few is all it takes. For a while they were suspicious in Canada too, albeit a long time ago. When one of my uncles was applying for immigration in Canada (from within the US), the interviewer told him that Mauritian passports were not viewed positively.

   @Clive
   I saw that article in L’Express. It would be interesting to hear the other side’s version.

   Going to Europe with a Mauritian passport (before June 2009) with a Mauritian passport and a Canadian passport was like night and day.

   Comment by Patrick Ng — Monday, 1 June 2009 12:03 GMT #

7. @ Eddy
   The voyager was held in custody and deported back without any explanation. The article can be found on the following link:

   http://www.lexpress-newspaper.com/epapermain.aspx?queryed=9&boxid=7921375&parentid=5044&eddate=04/29/09

   Now i leave you to decide whether this is called speculation or another.

   Comment by clive — Monday, 1 June 2009 17:10 GMT #

8. I read the article. I repeat, there is nothing unusual there. As I said, my cousin was held in the so-called “centre de detention”, which is really just a waiting room with locked doors (for obvious reasons). The immigration officers gave him food although he did not get a bed to sleep on. When we asked the officers why he was being kept, they said that they still had a long queue to process and they could not interview him until the next day.

   Of course, it is not ideal if your intentions are honest, but I doubt there has been foul play. Every visitor who is selected for questioning is subjected to the same treatment. Mind you, *every* action taken by officials in the UK is scrutinised, and an unfair visa refusal will not go un-noticed.

   Eddy.

   Comment by Eddy — Monday, 1 June 2009 20:32 GMT #

9. It would be interesting to hear what the reason of his deportation was if Arvind Boolell did ask for an explanation.

   I would like to know the versions of both sides before I can say who is right or who is wrong. On one hand, some Mauritians do try to be “smart” but not all of them. On the other hand, immigration officers hold some power and can make life difficult for visitors. I know it, because I’ve experienced some bad times when applying for a French visa in Toronto. Moreover, I was asked so many questions when I traveled to France/England/Switzerland with my Mauritian passport, but none when I traveled with my Canadian one.

   Comment by Patrick Ng — Monday, 1 June 2009 20:52 GMT #

10. I would like to add that sometimes being an Arab these days can work against oneself when flying. There was a famous case in Canada not too long ago. Maher Arar on his way back to Canada from USA, was held and deported not back to Canada, but to Syria.

    Comment by Patrick Ng — Monday, 1 June 2009 20:57 GMT #

11. Holding a euporean, american or any developed country’s passport does open wide avenues, for obvious reasons. Someone with a developing country’s passport will be subject to further scrutiny than someone from a developed.

    Comment by clive — Tuesday, 2 June 2009 13:56 GMT #

Leave a comment

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

XHTML: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail

Notify me of new posts by email.